Customer stories

    Good teams. Broken wiring. Fixed.

    Trades, construction and manufacturing businesses that ran on spreadsheets, memory and missed follow-ups — and what we built instead.

    Trades · NSW · ~$30M

    Stock, job costing and fleet tracking — built on the software they already owned.

    0→100%stock tracked
    10+ hrsback weekly
    9 wksto build
    Full case study
    Manufacturing · national · ~$10M

    Five siloed systems connected into one live record — quoting, projects, inventory, accounting, email.

    <1 hrchange flow
    15+ hrssaved weekly
    0phantom quotes
    Full case study
    Construction · sports surfaces · ~$8M

    Configured the platform they were already paying for, then automated every follow-up.

    $6.4MWIP live
    58leads worked
    12+ hrsback weekly
    Full case study
    Manufacturing · 65 staff · ~$20M

    Document-AI quoting, council monitoring and an AI receptionist — humans approve everything.

    80%faster quotes
    100%DAs caught
    <5 minresponse
    Full case study
    Case study 01

    A warehouse and twelve vans. One system that keeps count.

    CP
    Car park services groupTrades · NSW · ~$30M

    $30M of car park work ran on spreadsheets and memory. Stock lived in people's heads, job kits were built from parts that existed nowhere, and nobody knew what any job actually cost.

    We built the operating layer on the software they already owned. Stock for the warehouse and every van, reorder alerts, job costing, a live fleet dashboard — then trained the team to run it without us.

    Ran on
    Now runs
    Spreadsheets + memory
    Paper site reports
    Ad hoc fleet checks
    One job platformConfigured, connected, team-run
    Live stock + reorders
    Job costing
    Fleet alerts
    CP

    Reorder points on every item, costs on every job, and a rego flagged before it lapses.Owner · Car park services group

    0→100%Stock tracked — warehouse + 12 vans
    100%Jobs costed, quote vs actual
    10+ hrs/wkAdmin handed back to the team (EST)
    9 wksTo build the system
    Case study 02

    Five systems that never spoke. One record everyone trusts.

    SI
    Sports infrastructure manufacturerManufacturing · national · ~$10M

    ~100 contracts a year at a $260K average quote — quoting, projects, inventory, accounting and email in five silos, re-keyed by hand. Sales quoted stock the company didn't have, and a date change took days to reach the warehouse.

    We connected all five into one live project feed. Entered once, visible everywhere: real stock for sales, automatic alerts when dates move, completion evidence back before the invoice goes out.

    Ran on
    Now runs
    5 disconnected systems
    4 tender inboxes
    Hand re-keying
    One live recordQuote → project → invoice, entered once
    Live stock for sales
    Date-change alerts
    Invoicing off real status
    SI

    Everything's entered once and everyone knows within the hour.Owner · Sports infrastructure manufacturer

    Days → <1hrSchedule-change flow to warehouse
    15+ hrs/wkHand re-keying eliminated (EST)
    0Quotes against phantom stock
    Month 1First visible win shipped
    Case study 03

    $6.4M of jobs, zero reports. Now it chases everything itself.

    SC
    Sports construction groupConstruction · sports surfaces · ~$8M

    The job platform was installed but never configured: every job at $0 budget, 95% falsely flagged overdue, 58 leads sitting cold. The owner was the reporting system.

    We configured the platform they were already paying for, put $6.4M of work on a live dashboard, then automated the leaks — quote follow-ups, lead re-engagement, invoice chasing and a weekly report.

    Ran on
    Now runs
    Unconfigured platform
    Owner-built reports
    Manual chasing
    Same platform, configuredAutomations layered on top
    Quote follow-ups
    Invoice chasing
    Weekly report, auto
    SC

    Every quote gets followed up, every invoice gets chased. Nobody has to remember.Owner · Sports construction group

    $6.4MWIP on a live dashboard
    58Stalled leads re-engaged
    12+ hrs/wkOwner admin recovered (EST)
    12Gaps found → build queue
    Case study 04

    Floor plans, councils, phones. The AI handles all three.

    HM
    Heating products manufacturerManufacturing · 65 staff · ~$20M

    Every quote started with hand-measuring a scanned apartment plan — the team's #1 bottleneck. Council development applications were spotted by luck, and follow-up ran on memory.

    We built a document-AI pipeline that reads the plans and drafts the quote for human approval, monitoring agents that watch every council daily, and an AI receptionist with five outbound voice campaigns.

    Ran on
    Now runs
    Scanned floor plans
    Council websites
    Inbound + missed calls
    AI layer in their CRMHumans approve everything out
    Draft quotes, ready to send
    Daily council digest
    24/7 call-backs
    HM

    The AI drafts it, we approve it, and every lead gets a call back in minutes.Operations lead · Heating products manufacturer

    80%Less time per quote (EST)
    100%Council DAs caught, daily
    <5 minLead response, 24/7 (EST)
    4 mthsThree AI systems live
    Let’s talk

    Every week, manual work is quietly draining your margins. Let’s go find it.

    Claim Your Free Operations Audit
    Free · 30 min · You own the findings either way
    EZYE Consulting · ezye.com.au · Clients anonymised pending sign-off · figures from client systems & engagement records