Free — no credit card
EZYE OS · AI Models
An open model just beat Claude Opus 4.6 on coding.
Here's the full benchmark breakdown, numbers and all.
See exactly where Qwen 3.8 outscores a frontier closed model, and what it really takes to run it.
What's inside
- The two benchmarks where Qwen beats Claude Opus 4.6
- Real hardware and checkpoint requirements, no guessing
- What 6B active parameters actually means for cost
- How to read open-vs-closed model claims critically
EZYE OS · AI Models Cheat Sheet
Qwen 3.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6: The Full Benchmark Breakdown
by Divjot Sahni · EZYE Consulting · ezye.com.au
The Headline Result
1
Qwen 3.8 runs with only 6B active parameters
2
It beats Claude Opus 4.6 on two real coding benchmarks
3
The win is not marginal, it's a clean beat on both
4
But the fine print changes who can actually use it...
The Numbers Side by Side
1
SWE-bench Pro: Qwen 62.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 at 53.4
2
Office-agent tasks: Qwen 73.9 vs Claude Opus 4.6 at 68.2
3
Both are real-world agent benchmarks, not toy tests
4
The catch that stops most people from running it: ...
Free access — enter your email below